.xxx vs .kids.us
CNN is reporting that ICANN is moving ahead with a plan to create a ‘.xxx’ domain for adult (ie, porn) sites.
This is even stupider than .kids.us, and that’s saying a lot. Back in 2002, Congress passed the The Dot Kids Implementation and Efficiency Act to create a safe haven for kids-friendly websites. Neustar has the contract to run it and keep it kids-friendly; back in late 2002/early 2003, they were very optimistic about how many sites there woudl be, or at least they claimed to be. The goal was to have enough content in .kids.us that parents could use a whitelist filter on the internet — if everything a kid wants is in .kids.us, or at least enough of it is, then they don’t need to venture out into the scary world of .com.
.kids.us registration opened September 4, 2003. More than a year and a half later, how many .kids.us domains are there?
As far as I can tell, the full list is:
- A
- Abckids
- Americaslibrary
- Firstgov
- Games
- Info
- KNEX
- Minnesota
- Mummies
- Music
- NOAA
- NewYork
- News
- Nick
- Nickjr
- PBSKids
- Smithsonian
- Space
- Stnicholas
- Summum
- Switchzoo
- Trampoline
- Trampolines
- Us
Wow, 24 domains! Trampoline and Trampolines have identical content, but we’ll let that slide. Oh, yeah: a, info, music, space, games, us, newyork and news are all from the same people. And Summum and Mummies have the same content. Nick and NickJR are both Nickelodeon, of course. So those 24 domains are 22 unique sets of content from 14 different companies. Is that enough to replace the rest of the internet, you think?
So, will .xxx do even worse than this? No, I don’t think so — I expect there will be a couple hundred domains within the first few months it’s live, even at $60/year. But they won’t be new sites, and they won’t replace existing sites. They won’t do anything to ‘clean up’ the other domains. So, will it make it easier for customers to find their smut? Well, maybe, but it’s hardly ilke that’s hard now. So what’s the point?
The point is, it’s a way for a ‘legit’ company to siphon off $60/year from pretty much every major porn site. it’s a way for someone to make money from the smut industry without having to get into the smut business. I understand why ICM Registry Inc. is in favor of it. I don’t understand why ICANN is.
2005-06-01 23:13:14 | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | Computers::Internet::DNS
This is Courier -- note how hard the braces and parentheses are to differentiate, how the '=' and '>' aren't vertically centered, and just how generally ugly it is.
This is Lucida Typewriter, which I believe is a standard system font on Windows and thus nearly as ubiquitous as Courier. Note that braces and parenthesis are easily differentiated, as well as opening and closing braces.
This is Luxi Mono, a good choice as a default mono face for current Linux systems (and in fact, it is the default "monotype" face for the Phoenix/XFT combination). The letterforms look a lot like Courier, nothing to really throw people off, while still being much easier to read.
This is neep, my preferred coding face. Every character is readily distinguishable -- note the 'l's and single quotes. That does mean the letter forms aren't as close to Courier's as, say, Luxi's, but I'm more than willing to live with that for a face that's easy to read and never ever confuses me.